Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

Leica Tele-Elmar 135mm 1:4.0 (RED SCALE)

Right, 2014 is a big year for me in terms of photography. Not only have I made a big leap in my photographical skill, but I’ve also made a switch from my much loved and used Canon DSLR setup to the famous RED DOT Elite German Leica M camera. Please forgive me, I can just go on and on and on about Leica… it’s like a Ferrari in heart though a much more practical luxury item that I can make money from it and not just ‘showing off’.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

Relatively compact but long for a rangefinder camera.

Here I am, my first revisit review for some of my legacy Leica lenses: Leitz Tele-Elmar 135mm 1:4.0 (you can see my previous review based on film Leica M6 HERE).

Before I start writing, I need to briefly describe the purpose of these ‘revisits’. As many of you know that Leica M cameras have been around since 1950’s and the latest digital M, the Leica M Type 240 is the most advance M camera yet. But best of all, the latest M is compatible with almost all the M lenses Leica has ever produced!!! So I am happy to use some of my older M lenses on my M240 just to see how they perform and whether they are still noteworthy and relevant in 2014. I am aiming to keep updating my list of legacy lenses so I can update you with some latest digital images with M240.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

The Tele-Elmar is a very sharp lens but has a very classical rendering.

All my revisit will be rather short because I don’t need to repeat the same thing that I wrote the review before. Most importantly, I want to showcase images here so you have an idea on how these ‘old’ lenses perform and the good and bad on handling. Again, no lab tests, charts or MTFs, I just let the pictures speak for themselves.

But I will still highlight a few areas where people seem to be interested in: Sharpness, Rendering (Bokeh) and handling (with M240 body).

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

Therefore, it’s very suitable for black and white work.

First I will start with sharpness. This is a topic for all geeks out there. Despite my opinion isn’t scientific and frankly I won’t use any MTF charts, I am attaching a few images here so you can see how sharp this legend really is. I am not joking, despite being a 1960’s design, it just shows how brilliant this lens is. It’s performance simply rivals the best there is in today’s lineup. Technically it may lag behind the latest Leica Tely-Elmar APO or the simply alien-made Zeiss 135mm f/2 Sonna APO, but to 99% of the population out there, this old and rather slow Tele-Elmar is sharp enough for any use.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

This is a focal length mostly that is regarded as portrait in 35mm format. But it’s good for pull far away landscape or details towards you.

When shot wide open, the bokeh is pleasingly smooth and round. Out of focus area is buttery with that Elmar signature. 135 is perfect for head-and-shoulder portrait shot. Though with a rather slow f/4 aperture, it means it’s more of a daylight lens. With no image stabilizer, it means you need a pretty fast shutter speed to combat camera/lens shake too. But fortunately, Leica M hasn’t got mirror so one less vibration to worry about when shooting long lens.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

Right, I am not a wildlife photographer so forgive me for my poor skill but this just shows how sharp and capable this lens is.

The best thing about this lens is that its performance is near peak at wide open so there’s no need to stop down to get the ‘best’ of this lens. Though just for your information, it’s dawn sharp between f/5.6 – 8. So it’s great also for pulling details from afar (ideal for some landscape and cityscape).

The close relative to this lens is the not-so-famous-hater Leica Elmarit-M 135mm 1:2.8. I haven’t had a chance to use one and I really would love to try to see if it’s an equally good lens. But from what I’ve heard so far, it’s not as good as this when shot wide open (but we are talking about 2.8 vs 4.0!!). When they both compare at f/4 then there isn’t much difference. I can get one relatively cheap these days so may be I will get one (version 2 is the better one apparently…).

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

Even with f/4 aperture, you can still achieve very thin depth of field if you shoot close to your subject.

Last but not least, handling. I do think Leica is best suit with shorter lenses. 90mm is probably the longest for the M before it starts to lose balance. Tele-Elmar isn’t a heavy lens nor big by any means but it’s long, especially so when the monster hood is attached. It doesn’t look pretty. But other than look and balance. It’s not too bad to hold and operate. My copy was one of the rarer first batch ‘red’ scale Tele-Elmar. Apparently only a handful was made with red letters so I must be lucky (I didn’t know when I bought it). Despite its age, the aperture ring is snappy and precise, the focusing ring is silky smooth with no play. My 39-year-old eyes do find it difficult to focus however. I bought the EVF just to use this lens so I can see the focus better. Because of its focal length, using the traditional rangefinder patch can prove difficult. I have no problem getting pin sharp picture for my equally old Leica Summicron 90mm but 135 is just harder if not impossible. I find myself squinting my eyes a lot. Mind you, M240’s finder is already the best in M cameras and I sill find it hard. I could have used the 1.4x eyepiece, which I also use for my M6. I just want to see if I can use EVF to do the job.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary, Bokeh

Bokeh is really lovely with this at f/4.


Is this 50 something years old lens still relevant in 2014? Does it still perform after all these days? Will I use it for work and projects? The answer to all these questions is YES and a BIG FAT one too! Being a Leica manual lens means that it lasts. If it’s been cared for (not stored) over the years, service and use regularly, there shouldn’t be any problems. It’s a little long for M but people have been shooting with them since its inception. 135mm is good for portrait and it is possibly the longest I would use with any M cameras. But despite is ‘slowness’, this is truly a gem and it will continue to shine and surprise you with traditional ‘LEICA’ quality. One last word though, be sure to check the focusing of the lens if you are to get one. it may need to calibrate to match your M camera if you are using any film M camera or any digital M before M240 (because M240 can use EVF to combat any focusing error of the lens). But I still prefer using the rangefinder than EVF but it does work.

Leica Tele Elmar 135mm, Leica Photographer, Jimmy Cheng, London Wedding Documentary

It really is a great portrait lens and especially for outdoor purposes because of its slower speed.


Thank you for reading my blog and please support my work and this site by buying stuff from Amazon via the link at the bottom (only if you need to buy stuff of course). 


 eBay is currently the largest market in used Leica lenses so if you want to try a sample of this lens, feel free to click on to the following links

Looking for Leica Tele Elmar 135mm on eBay UK?

Looking for Leica Tele Elmar 135mm on eBay US?

I have shot black and white jpeg from the M240 for this test so I don’t have any colour photos to show but please check out my flickr page for more as and when I update it to include more photos. My flickr page is HERE.




7 responses to “LENS REVISIT – LEICA TELE-ELMAR 1:4/135

  1. Pingback: LENS REVIEW – LEICA TELE-ELMAR 1:4/135 | talktog·

  2. Pingback: Professional Review – Leica M Type 240 for work! | talktog·

  3. Hi, I have a Leica M Tele Elmar 135, I love it and I would like to know what are the best apertures for sharpness…thank you

    • To be honest, it’s pretty dawn sharp at f/4 already but I reserve this aperture for portrait because of two reasons, first, subject isolation, second sharp but not sharp enough to show all the negatives stuff for women who are conscious about their skins. The sharpest range is between 5.6-8 in my opinion. Many shots you see in my post here shot within this range.

  4. Pingback: LENS REVISIT – LEICA SUMMICRON 90MM 1:2.0 V.2 | talktog·

  5. Pingback: LENS REVISIT – LEIZT SUMMILUX 35MM 1:1.4 PRE-ASPH | talktog·

  6. Pingback: Photography Bluff – The Next Leica M (Type-XXX) | talktog·

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s